Recruiting vs. Ranking College Football Team Performance: Big East

Sponsors:

 Switch Years: 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Caveats:

  • Each year's recruiting rating is an average of the rank order ratings from two major recruiting services.
  • The Recruiting Rating Average is weighted to give the most weight for 3rd and 4th year student-athletes, and the least for 1st year student-athletes.
  • The Recruiting Rating Averages are rank ordered to assign each team a Recruiting Ranting Ranking for the team's recruiting rating average.
  • The Post-Bowl Ranking is an average of 20+ ranking services. It is not simply the AP, Coaches, or BCS ratings.
  • Read the full explanation on the index page.

Index | Top 20 Overachieving Teams
ACC | Big 12 | Big East | Big Ten | Conference USA | Independents | MAC | Mountain West | Pac-10 | SEC | Sun Belt | WAC

Updated 15 December 2008: 2008 pre-bowl rankings have now been included and the differences between those rankings and the recruiting ratings have been calculated.

School Conference 2007 Rating 2006 Rating 2005 Rating 2004 Rating 2003 Rating 2007 Recruiting Rating Avg 2007 Recruiting Rating Ranking 2007 Post-Bowl Ranking 2007 Post-Bowl Difference Missing Ratings?
Cincinnati Big East 84.5 88 84.5 77.5 88 83.24 82 17 65
Connecticut Big East 58 75.5 69 86 85 77.11 74 33 41
Louisville Big East 44 30 44 59 41.5 45.9 59 55 -5
Pittsburgh Big East 17 16 40 47.5 36.5 36.41 37 63 -26
Rutgers Big East 32.5 54 67.5 48.5 57 56.08 57 39 18
South Florida Big East 51.5 43.5 52 43 84.5 50.56 52 21 31
Syracuse Big East 47 51 52.5 52 57.5 52.32 54 100 -46
West Virginia Big East 20.5 54 32 50 52 43.88 49 3 46