Recruiting vs. Ranking College Football Team Performance: MAC 2006

Sponsors:

 Switch Years: 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005

Caveats:

  • Each year's recruiting rating is an average of the rank order ratings from two major recruiting services.
  • The Recruiting Rating Average is weighted to give the most weight for 3rd and 4th year student-athletes, and the least for 1st year student-athletes.
  • The Recruiting Rating Averages are rank ordered to assign each team a Recruiting Ranting Ranking for the team's recruiting rating average.
  • The Post-Bowl Ranking is an average of 20+ ranking services. It is not simply the AP, Coaches, or BCS ratings.
  • Read the full explanation on the index page.

Index | Top 20 Overachieving Teams
ACC | Big 12 | Big East | Big Ten | Conference USA | Independents | MAC | Mountain West | Pac-10 | SEC | Sun Belt | WAC

Updated 15 December 2008: 2008 pre-bowl rankings have now been included and the differences between those rankings and the recruiting ratings have been calculated.

School Conference 2006 Rating 2005 Rating 2004 Rating 2003 Rating 2002 Rating 2006 Recruiting Rating Avg Pre-Bowl Ranking Pre-Bowl Difference Post-Bowl Ranking Post-Bowl Difference Missing Ratings?
Akron MAC 82.5 76 103 98.5 84.5 93.6 91 2.6 92 1.6
Ball State MAC 79 106 101 107.5 95.5 101.6 81 20.6 82 19.6
Bowling Green MAC 83 102.5 79.5 89 97.5 90.28 108 -17.78 108 -17.78
Buffalo MAC 97 103 110.5 93.5 83 94.55 114 -19.45 114 -19.45 2002x1
Central Michigan MAC 101 93.5 98.5 94.5 98 96.68 46 50.68 44 52.68
Eastern Michigan MAC 104 110.5 95.5 107.5 89.5 98.35 116 -17.65 116 -17.65
Kent MAC 112.5 100 114.5 87.5 108 102.05 90 12.05 93 9.05
Miami-OH MAC 87.5 115 87.5 111 96 100.08 110 -9.925 111 -10.925
Northern Illinois MAC 107.5 90.5 86 104.5 92 94.8 66 28.8 72 22.8
Ohio MAC 87 101 95 100.5 105.5 100.9 61 39.9 64 36.9
Toledo MAC 81.5 95 100 87.5 98.5 94.85 97 -2.15 98 -3.15
Western Michigan MAC 100.5 98.5 82 98.5 88 90.7 64 26.7 62 28.7